<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tone woods and Solid Guitars. Debate settled, scientifically.	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2012/11/21/tone-woods-and-solid-guitars-debate-settled-scientifically/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2012/11/21/tone-woods-and-solid-guitars-debate-settled-scientifically/</link>
	<description>Exegesis Hermeneutics Flux Capacitor of Truthiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger Lewis		</title>
		<link>/2012/11/21/tone-woods-and-solid-guitars-debate-settled-scientifically/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2012/11/21/tone-woods-and-solid-guitars-debate-settled-scientifically#comment-31</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;br /&gt;DKGCustom8:10 PM1&lt;br /&gt;Reply&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;+stampingdragon Please take your long winded debate, somewhere else.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I will ban you from this channel if you continue to fill this thread up with STUFF. You&#039;re obviously a fighter for this cause, but I&#039;m not here for you to repost long spiels born in other forums.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From that blog: &quot;to discern any qualitative sound difference the effect of the wood is not statistically significant in the signal&quot;﻿&lt;br /&gt;Show less&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;stampingdragon8:15 PM&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;This paper alone settles this discussion for any scientifically minded person. http://www.lam.jussieu.fr/Membres/Pate/Fichiers/ArthurPate_SMAC2013_Poster.pdf&lt;br /&gt;It makes very little difference it is true but it is empirically proven that a small difference exists which is of course both magnified and diminished in differing measures along the signal chain.&lt;br /&gt;On statistical significance, how long is a piece of string?﻿]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DKGCustom8:10 PM1<br />Reply</p>
<p>+stampingdragon Please take your long winded debate, somewhere else.</p>
<p>I will ban you from this channel if you continue to fill this thread up with STUFF. You&#39;re obviously a fighter for this cause, but I&#39;m not here for you to repost long spiels born in other forums.</p>
<p>From that blog: &#8220;to discern any qualitative sound difference the effect of the wood is not statistically significant in the signal&#8221;﻿<br />Show less</p>
<p>stampingdragon8:15 PM</p>
<p>This paper alone settles this discussion for any scientifically minded person. <a href="http://www.lam.jussieu.fr/Membres/Pate/Fichiers/ArthurPate_SMAC2013_Poster.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.lam.jussieu.fr/Membres/Pate/Fichiers/ArthurPate_SMAC2013_Poster.pdf</a><br />It makes very little difference it is true but it is empirically proven that a small difference exists which is of course both magnified and diminished in differing measures along the signal chain.<br />On statistical significance, how long is a piece of string?﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger Lewis		</title>
		<link>/2012/11/21/tone-woods-and-solid-guitars-debate-settled-scientifically/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2012/11/21/tone-woods-and-solid-guitars-debate-settled-scientifically#comment-30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
