Earl Bramley-Howard 10:58am Feb 2 Ok I will remiove you as you clearly cannot take the warnings. My position is supported by the vast majority of ‘Climate Scientists’ (Steyn is most certainly NOT a climate scientist) There is no ad hominem… I think your entire reason for being in this group is to cause arguments based on climate science denial. I’ve seen you do it before and warned you before. I see no ‘evidence’ from you (or Steyn). What I do see is denial dressed up in clever obfuscation and all the smoke and mirrors straw man arguments I’ve come to expect from so-called ‘educated’ deniers. You use polemic as the intro and it’s down hill from there. Take it elsewhere.
Jem Randles shared a link.
Comments
https://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/…/climate… You will notice that both sides of the story are presented and that court…See More
https://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/02/impacts-i-introduction/
´´A couple of common complaints in the blogosphere that I’ve noticed are:…See More
“A 2004 profile of Steyn in the Boston Phoenix described him as “the most toxic right-wing pundit you’ve never heard of” “…See More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g093lhtpEFo
I do not deny Climate change so what you say regarding taking denial elsewhere does not make sense. If you mean the AGW CO2 Hypothesis denial,…See More
I read it… did you?
Your stance is antagonistic to the vast body of scientific evidence.
The co2 is plant food video is over 6 years old… yes it is silly… because the claims by Monckton et al, are utterly ridiculous.
You don’t fool me with this “I believe in climate change” position, because it is clearly a set up to denying the evidence about the causes of that change.
I am not going to continue with this discussion… I will simply remove you from the group if it continues.
Final #admin warning.
0046702273052
skype: rogerglewis
Skype telephone number +46406931188
Portfolio of on line Profiles( Go on be Nosy ) CLICK HERE PLEASE
#ConquestofDough




















You must log in to post a comment.