Breaking News

Lord Monckton on the English Democrats Judicial Review. #BorisNonBrino #JeSuisBourgoiseBlancHomme #JeSuisVinBlancMan

June 10, 2019

https://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/2019/05/opponents-are-attempting-to-undermine.html

Policies like EU Military Unification and Climate Emergency policy are of course separate fields on the face of it but if you think about it, wonder a little more. How many times have you heard now “The Climate emergency is our WW2”,

It is with this in mind that I invited Lord Monckton to comment on the English Democrat leader’s Blog with his critique of the current Court Case which has been brought against ( the now ex-Leader of the Conservative and Unionist Party) & Prime minister Theresa May’s Minority Government, United Kingdom and Northern Ireland.

The Slides from Climate Mistakes Presentation.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/06/08/feedback-is-not-the-big-enchilada/?replytocom=2719810#comment-2719810

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/03/27/judge-in-exxonknew-case-accepts-amicus-brief-exposing-climatologys-grave-error/

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/03/19/global-warming-on-trial-and-the-elementary-error-of-physics-that-caused-the-global-warming-scare/

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/03/30/game-over/

Just to make it Easy for Professional Debunkers Link to His Lordship at SKeptical Science.
https://skepticalscience.com/Monckton_Myths_arg.htm

Monckton responds to Skeptical Science

Anthony Watts / February 3, 2012

Cooking the books

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

Mr. John Cook, who runs a website puzzlingly entitled Skeptical Science” (for he is not in the least sceptical of the “official” position) seems annoyed that I won the 2011 televised debate with Dr. Denniss of the Australia Institute, and has published a commentary on what I said. It has been suggested that I should reply to the commentary. So, seriatim, I shall consider the points made. Mr. Cook’s comments are in Roman face: my replies are in bold face. Since Mr. Cook accuses me of lying, I have asked him to be good enough to make sure that this reply to his commentary is posted on his website in the interest of balance.

Feedback is not the big enchilada

Guest Blogger / 2 days ago June 8, 2019

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

I am most grateful to Mr Stokes for his interesting recent posting in which he explains what he sees as the difference between official climatology’s implementation of feedback in deriving climate sensitivity and the approach taken by my co-authors and me.

“In response to Mr Lewis, I looked at Tillbrook’s pleadings and was unconvinced by them,”
Hello Lord Monkton, Thanks for the reply.
Obviously, this is the wrong Article and Forum to discuss the issue, perhaps you would be kind enough to make a comment on Robin Tilbrook’s blog where those of us interested in securing a Sovereign Parliament, both Commons and Lords can War Game the pleadings and make the best case possible.
I am a great admirer of your work on Climate Modelling problem and Skeptical voices are needed in civil society both sides of the pond at the moment.
Thanks for taking the time to comment,
Best Wishes
Roger
https://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/2019/04/detailed-submissions-in-re-queen-on.html
I have posted our interaction on Robins Blog, I hope you might find the time to come and add your invaluable insights to our efforts. Climate Emergency policy is clearly a big thing at the moment Tory Leadership Candidates and Corbynistas all do the required degrees of Bed Wetting virtue signalling over the Evil’s of Emissions and 1.5 degrees and 12 years to doomageddon.

Here is a tweet from Kier Starmer Sedwills spook on the inside of the Corbyn controlled opposition.

https://t.co/3LGng72FpK OUR ONLY DEBT IS TO NATURE AND ‘WHAT IS’. ENVIRONMENTAL PRAGMATISM, LIVE AND LET LIVE.
MR. GORES 3 STRIKES #ConquestofDough #WrongKindofGreen #8thWaytoThink

— GrubStreetJournal (@GrubStreetJorno) June 9, 2019

https://t.co/3LGng72FpK OUR ONLY DEBT IS TO NATURE AND ‘WHAT IS’. ENVIRONMENTAL PRAGMATISM, LIVE AND LET LIVE.MR. GORES 3 STRIKES #ConquestofDough #WrongKindofGreen #8thWaytoThink— RogerGLewis (@PMotels) June 9, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Here is the Exchange with Lord Monckton.

Chris,

can you help with Brexit please. Just get us out.

🙂

Monckton of Brenchley

June 8, 2019 at 1:08 pm

Will do! Consider us gone.

Reply
- HotScot
  
  June 8, 2019 at 1:57 pm
  
  Yesssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  
  Reply
- Roger G Lewis
  
  June 9, 2019 at 3:52 am
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYGewudfxDk&t=2831s
  Robin Tillbrooks English Democrats #MEGA has brought a judicial review, according to the pleadings to the court Brexit occurred on 29th March 2019.
  https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2019/06/01/the-eu-is-deeply-anti-democratic-the-uk-spring-will-be-a-european-spring-no-amount-of-potemkin-village-pretence-will-fool-the-european-public-further-once-bitten-twice-shy-en-marche-or-on-yer-bike/
  
  Reply
  - Monckton of Brenchley
    
    June 9, 2019 at 11:50 am
    
    In response to Mr Lewis, I looked at Tillbrook’s pleadings and was unconvinced by them, unfortunately, attractive though his proposition undoubtedly was. Had Parliament not altered the original statute mandating our departure on 29 March at 11.30 pm, with or without a deal, then on that date and time our EU membership would have been an unhappy and very expensive episode in our history. However, Parliament reversed itself, even though (if I remember correctly) it did not do so in a Bill, but merely by a resolution. However, once Parliament has spoken, even if it acts in manifest breach of its own rules (which, inter alia, require that legislation already on the statute-book cannot be amended except by subsequent primary legislation enacted by Parliament after all the 11 due stages), the Courts will not intervene.
    
    Reply